Biblical view of interracial dating

Similarly, Massachusetts forbade miscegenation by law in 1705, North Carolina in 1715, South Carolina in 1717, Delaware in 1721, Louisiana in 1724, and on and on.Some states, which were formed later in America’s history, still had sufficient popular opinion to illegalize interracial marriage even into the twentieth century, e.g. In sum, over 40 states had laws forbidding the marriage of whites with non-whites (though not all laws prohibited marriages with every type of non-white).We never see your credit card or personal information.

biblical view of interracial dating-70

The subject is presented today as if it were quite obvious that interracial marriage is both permissible and positively good.

It is tacitly assumed that everyone has thought the same way in history, except for a few evil men who thought otherwise due to racial bigotry and especially to “ignorance,” as the accusation often goes.

Yet, what is noteworthy here is the persistence of anti-miscegenation legislation for a very large portion of American history.

One of the earliest examples of this is Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law of 1691, which forbade the marriage of whites with any non-whites.

You will provide credit card and personal information only to CCBill's secure site.

Your information is transmitted via encryption between you and payment system.

This clearly shows the historic opinion of Americans on the matter.

Besides these laws, which show themselves to be of great weight when considering the propriety of interracial marriage, I would like to look at one specific example of an anti-miscegenation opinion.

Allegedly, the only reason people would be opposed to marrying those of other races is because they have hatred or animosity for other races.

Tags: , ,